When you look up for software or to make an online presence you need to hire a developer who has extremely well in developing great software. You are in a highly competitive online market, in order to be successful in this environment you need to have a well-developed and highly qualified software for your online business.
Therefore, you should try to build a perfect team of developers to create an innovative and perfect software solution for your needs.
If you are a startup owner or a software development firm looking for a developer, then you must have realized till now that today’s competition is tough and not having the best full-stack developers can harm your business prospects.
In a software development firm, the entire performance of the company depends on the quality of the developers especially full stack developers who look up your project entirely. In any case, you should look for quality developers to get maximum benefits.
So, its obsessives to hire a full-stack developer those not only good enough to be able to build quality software and also an efficient one for your pay. When you have a developer, who is good and affordable, then it will give you some room for the expenses of business development and marketing processes.
However, here the question is how to hire a best full-stack developer who is of the best quality? In this article, we have elaborated on hiring full-stack developers only so that you can make a wise decision. Hiring the best full-stack developers who are experts working in top programming languages using various development tools and are fully capable of developing amazing software solutions.
Let us Look Over what is Quality in Software Development
Software quality generally referred to satisfy your expectations. In a nutshell, it ensures the product works correctly. The software needs to be easy to use and error-free to qualify as better software. It also enables users to perform tasks quickly and effortlessly, on any device, and at any time.
For software developers, software quality assurance is a moving target. There is also many software QA standard, which defines the way how developers build a software development plan.
When it comes to quality in full stack development, testing, and overall operations, these are the questions you should be asking yourself:
* How many stories are made and in the development process?
* How many of these were delivered with high quality to the end-user?
* How much time did it take to deliver from the business or customer concept to production?
* Are our end users consuming the capabilities they asked for?
This helps in defining the fine standard in defining the whole product as the qualities of a full stack developer.
The demand for software delivery speed continues to increase along with the demand for a reduction in costs. But how can you achieve these goals when you don't have the time and resources to manually test every build? When you can't afford to wait and find those defects in your late-stage releases? The answer is to follow the build life cycle from the story to code on a developer desktop. Next, you should check, build, and unit test.
You can automate the process like functional, performance, security, and even testing. This gives teams the ability to show the quality of a build throughout the life cycle with quality metrics and automated pass/fail rates.
Given the frequency of these builds and automated tests, build-life results can be created and measured in seconds, minutes, and hours.
When you have a fully automated process, then it will enable your team to deliver with speed and quality, while reducing costs through higher efficiency.
External quality sees how it function from outside in varies the preference like navigation, responsiveness, etc... This is entirely concern about providing customer value and meets the product owner's specifications.
This will be the prime responsibility of the full-stack developers who construct the entire system and the way how it behaves. It is mostly related to providing clean code, complexity, duplication, component reuse.
There are varies tools available out in the market to measure this quality. The predefined standards, linting tools, unit tests, etc. If you have a poor internal quality affects your ability to manage and reason about the program.
Software development approaches are the process of creating new software solutions that solve particular problems. The software can design and developed in many different ways.
Each approach varies based on the project and the type of problem that is needed to address it. Here are some commonly used approaches to software development.
* Structured Approach
* Agile Approach
* Prototyping Approach
* Rapid Application Development Approach
* End-User Approach
It uses the below development cycle to build the application.
* Defining the problem
* Planning the solution
* Building the solution
* Checking the solution
* Modifying the solution.
Used when there is a high budget, where there is a long period to complete the project and is where the project should be completed by teams. It is characterized by distinct stages, with each stage being completed before moving onto the next stage.
* Long-time periods from start to implementation of the final product.
* This will most suit large-scale projects, or difficult projects, or new concept projects which have high budgets.
Agile - quick thinking, coordinated, active and lean. Adapts well to changing situations.
They emphasize the team developing the system rather than following predefined structured development processes.
Encourage cooperation and teamwork. If the web-based application or software applications which are need modification regularly then the agile approach can be preferred.
* Speed of getting a working solution to market or users.
* Responds well to changing specifications.
* The development team and clients collaborate closely throughout development.
In the prototyping approach first, the working model is developed then it will be developed further into a fully functioning solution.
Actually, Prototyping is an engineering technique in which the model is developed and it is established into the process. The developer makes a small-scale model of the proposed program so that users can give feedback and ensure it meets their needs.
* Prototypes focus on what the users interact with, the input and output requirements only.
* Prototypes are not interested in the code behind the interfaces.
* It is a non-formal approach.
* It encourages end-user participation.
* It improves communication between the programmer and the end-user.
In the rapid application development approach, the process is carried out in sequence then iterated to develop it. The sequential process often carried out using CASE tools which allow the rapid development of software applications.
It requires constant communication between developers and the end-users to understand the problem properly.
In the RAD approach product are only limited to the capabilities of the software used during development. Often programmers are restricted in their ability to manipulate lower levels of code.
* An extremely good approach for small scale projects.
* It enables to Reuse of code to great extant.
* Automated tools are used to make the software.
* Lacks the formal stages of other approaches.
* Fast development time.
The end-user approach is the customizing of existing programs to meet the specific needs of the end-user or customer.
Over here the end-user is capable of creating his own design and program for their needs. It involves modifying codes and functions to meet their needs.
* Lacks any formal stages.
* A very useful approach for small scale projects and small budget business.
* If you know want you to want exactly then this approach will great for you.
When a customer needs changes like adding, deleting or changing requirements or shift priorities at the beginning of each cycle, guiding the project team on the work for the next iteration can done easily.
It only affects the full-stack developer to modulate the changes and the rest of the crew remains undisturbed and does their work.
While it is required for customers to provide a detailed idea of his/her requirements concerning the intended software, full-stack developers software developers are more flexible because of their iterative style of work.
Using software development approaches like agile methodology, help the customers to be in contacting constantly in the loop till the end. This helps in providing suggestions for improving and reviewing every phase. If there are any changes in the requirement this helps in coordinating easily till implementation.
Since Full-stack developer ensures the quality through multiple rollout cycles, it has a better chance of providing exactly what the customers need at any given point in time.
These cycles are designed not only to add new features but also to make adjustments to what has already been deployed.
The infrastructure is continuously morphing to meet the changing needs of end-users. Thus, the result is greater customer satisfaction.
The solution offered by full-stack engineers that has an effective result in fast development from the starting of the development. This solution can be easily conveyed to the end-user either at the planning or design phase.
Then changes and new features are rolled out incrementally in future deployments. it improvises the development speed to reach the end product easily, as continuous improvements go on simultaneously.
Full-stack developers, get continuous feedback to shape the final design. And end-users allowed to provide feedback to the team and then the implementation team makes adjustments to the configuration to squeeze out extra value for the end-users.
As it was single handy done the management of the disruptions from outside are easier to control and avoid. And it is a lot harder for individuals to procrastinate because of tight deadlines and ever-watching eyes of the team.
If you are looking for the best full-stack developers then you must analysis the entire team/induvial quality before choosing them to work in your project. You have to ensure that is your developers are worthy of the money and time you spend on them.
The experience of the developers also should be considered when deciding them. Developers may not comfortable with every system and team that they work with if they have less experience.
If you have a large project then single developers may not be sufficient for the development you may need a dedicated team. So, it's always important to consider the size of the project and development methodologies before choosing them.
Since some development approaches may not well enough to handle large projects like the waterfall model which doesn’t offer frequent testing that is needed for large projects.
The next thing to consider is the cost of delay. It is needed to address too, otherwise, companies will run into problems if they need more funding and time to develop the application.
Feedback is needed to recreate ideas and overcome the challenges in future projects. If you do not know how you got the results you have, then you have no idea how to get them again. You have to figure out the solution or process that not give you the end product you desire.
Depending on the complexity and the size of the project the feedback also differs for developers.
When you select a full-stack developer you need to remember the below points in your mind.
* Requirements for the project based on size or time.
* You are expecting at the end of the project and solution applied to achieve it.
* Feedback on the work done before.
* How a change might be requested during development.
* Costs of delay.
* Experience of the full-stack developers with the technologies
* Project size.
No matter what the is a project, but ensures you have the best one to work on your project rather than setting for a cost-effective one. If you are a startup pay then more attention to agile methodologies. That help in providing your feedback regularly and flexible for changes that are needed at the end.
Infinijith is the one who follows agile methodologies in the development process. Take the advantage of it by hiring a full-stack developer who is best at both languages and tools to handle the project of any size.